The ECMWF operationnal implementation of four dimensional variational assimilation. Part. I: experimental results with simplified physics
L'implémentation opérationnelle au CEPMMT implementation de l'assimilation variationnelle à quatre dimensions. Partie. I : résultats expérimentaux avec physique simplifiée
Rabier, F. ; Jarvinen, H. ; Klinker, E. ; Mahfouf, J.F. ; Simmons, A.
Année de publication
2000
This paper presents results of a comparison between four-dimensional
variational assimilation (4D-Var). using a 6-hour assimilation window
and simplified physics during the minimization, and three-dimensional
variational assimilation (3D-Var). Results have been obtained at
operational' resolution T213L31/T63L31. (T defines the spectral
triangular truncation and L the number of levels in the vertical, with
the first parameters defining the resolution of the model trajectory,
and the second the resolution of the inner-loop.) The sensitivity of the
4D-Var performance to different set-ups is investigated. In particular,
the performance of 4D-Var in the Tropics revealed some sensitivity to
the way the adiabatic nonlinear normal-mode initialization of the
increments was performed. Going from four outer-loops to only one (as in
3D-Var), together with a change to the 1997 formulation of the
background constraint and an initialization of only the small scales,
helped to improve the 4D-Var performance. Tropical scores then became
only marginally worse for 4D-Var than for 3D-Var. Twelve weeks of
experimentation with the one outer-loop 4D-Var and the 1997 background
formulation have been studied. The averaged scores show a small but
consistent improvement in both hemispheres at all ranges. In the short
range, each two- to three-week period has been found to be slightly
positive throughout the troposphere. The better short-range performance
of the 4D-Var system is also shown by the fits of the background fields
to the data. More results are presented for the Atlantic Ocean area
during FASTEX (the Fronts and Atlantic Storm-Track Experiment), during
which 4D-Var is found to perform better. In individual synoptic cases
corresponding to interesting Intensive Observing Periods, 4D-Var has a
clear advantage over 3D-Var during rapid cyclogeneses. The very
short-range forecasts used as backgrounds are much closer to the data
over the Atlantic for 4D-Var than for 3D-Var. The 4D-Var analyses also
display more day-to-day variability. Some structure functions are
illustrated in the 4D-Var case for a height observation inserted at the
beginning, in the middle or at the end of the assimilation window. The
dynamical processes seem to be relevant, even with a short 6-hour
assimilation period, which explains the better overall performance of
the 4D-Var system.</div>
Texte intégral
Accès à la notice sur le site du portail documentaire de Météo-France